Change history
High-Protein Oat Pancakes
Currently at v1.3 · every substantive change to High-Protein Oat Pancakes, newest first. Site-wide changes appear in the full corrections ledger, which also explains what we correct and why.
v1.3Update
Every recipe now records the real-life moments it is the honest answer to ("Perfect when… you have ten minutes and two eggs"), and recipe cards show the first of them as a decision cue. Moments describe situations, never audiences. Ingredients, method and nutrition are unchanged.
Why: Chef organizes recipes around situations. Cards previously showed what a recipe is but not when to choose it — this puts the deciding moment where the decision happens.
v1.2Update
Every fact now appears exactly once per page. The aggregated "Substitutions & options" card was removed from recipe and side pages — substitution and optionality guidance renders only at the ingredient it belongs to. Nutrition-scope notes (for example "covers two chillas per person" or "based on full-fat paneer") moved from cook’s notes into the nutrition panel, and the boilerplate "nutrition values are estimates" sentence was removed from every cook’s note — the nutrition panel and the page disclaimer already state it. Ingredient-choice advice that lived in cook’s notes (which whey or skyr to buy, how ripe the banana or tomato should be) moved onto the ingredient itself. No quantities, methods or nutrition figures changed.
Why: A page-level review found the same guidance rendered two or three times in different wording, which forces readers to reconcile near-duplicate sentences. Chef follows a single-source-of-truth rule: each fact has one owner and renders once.
v1.1Update
Rewrote every ingredient substitution note into one consistent editorial pattern: a recommendation that starts with the alternative ("Use …", or "Optional." where the ingredient can simply be left out), followed by its effect on the dish or the nutrition estimate. The facts in each note — quantities, techniques and protein effects — are unchanged.
Why: Substitution guidance had accumulated several writing styles ("Or …", "Skip it …", "Skyr → …"), which read as inconsistent and made the notes harder to scan. One pattern, one voice.